October 22, 1063: Day of the Week
October 22, 1063 was the 295th day of the year 1063 in the Gregorian calendar. There were 70 days remaining until the end of the year. The day of the week was Thursday.
The day of the week for October 22, 1063 under the old Julian calendar was Wednesday. Did you notice the difference with the Gregorian calendar?
If you are trying to learn Spanish then this day of the week in Spanish is jueves.
A person born on this day will be 953 years old today. If that same person saved a Dime every day starting at age 6, then by now that person has accumulated $34,618.60 today. That is, assuming this person is still alive and kicking.
Here’s the October 1063 Gregorian calendar. You can also browse the full year monthly 1063 calendar.
Zodiac & Birthstone
Libra is the zodiac sign of a person born on this day. Opal is the modern birthstone for this month. Jasper is the mystical birthstone from Tibetan origin that dates back over a thousand years.
Hmmm... do you believe that self understanding is the key to happiness? Don’t just wish upon the stars. Use them to prosper in love, money, and career! Get your Libra horoscope and get a boost from the stars. Did I mention it’s F-R-E-E? (Sponsored link)
Gregorian versus the old Julian calendar
A note to students, teachers, scholars and anyone else passionate about this topic. As stated in the front page, this website is using the Gregorian calendar as the basis for all “day of the week” computation whether or not the Gregorian calendar is relevant for the date in question (October 22, 1063). Educators should point out the primary reason why Pope Gregory XIII introduced a new calendar system in October 1582. That is, to make the computation for the annual date of Easter more accurate since it is the foundation of the Christian faith.
Even with that purpose in mind, the Gregorian calendar too will become out of sync. It has a known approximation error of about one day for every 7,700 years assuming a constant time interval between vernal equinoxes (which is not true). This is better compared to the one day for every 128 years error of the Julian calendar.